Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
I am grateful to the noble Lord for pointing out the omission in subsection (2). I am happy to accept Amendment No. A210. I should like also to speak to Amendment No. A210A, which would remove overseas and unregistered companies from the requirements to notify appointments under this section. This subsection is unnecessary for unregistered companies as appropriate provision may be made by regulations under Clause 659. For overseas companies, the intention is to make appropriate provision under Part 25. On Question, amendment agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c389-90GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-12-17 19:40:17 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314205
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314205
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314205