Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

The purpose of Clause 766 is to provide the definition of terms used in the Bill for the avoidance of doubt. In the case of the consolidated fund we do not see the need for such a definition as there is no room for doubt about what is being referred to. Moreover—and this may be the Bill team’s revenge—the consolidated fund was in fact established by Section 1 of the Consolidated Fund Act 1816. I therefore hope that the noble Lord will be content to withdraw this amendment.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c394GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk