Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

These two amendments would restrict the application of their respective chapters to those with a UK place of business. They thus follow Section 1 of the Business Names Act 1985. However, in the 21st century, much trade is conducted over the internet by businesses without a UK place of business—indeed, by businesses without any fixed place of business. It is in the public interest that UK customers know not only the identity of any such business using a name which is not its own, but also how to contact them by non-electronic means. Of course, it will be difficult to enforce these provisions upon those who wish to hide their identity. Not all overseas and internet traders are so shy, however: enforcement authorities consider it useful for there to be a clear set of rules for those who are law abiding. It is in the interests of such traders and their UK customers that these provisions apply to all who carry on business in the UK under a name that is not truly their own. In the light of this, I hope the noble Lord will agree to withdraw his amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c409-10GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk