Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

We are not convinced that Amendments Nos. A233, A235 and A236 would clarify the application of Clauses 799 and 801. This is largely a matter of fashion in drafting practice. We do not think that the amendment is necessary. Amendment No. 234 would have the most undesirable effect of implying that writing must be in hard copy. We take the view that writing may be electronic.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c413-4GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk