Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

Part 1 of Schedule 10 restates provisions of Schedule 11 of the 1989 Act on the granting, refusing and revocation of recognition of orders recognising supervisory bodies. The 1989 Act does not require such orders to be made by statutory instrument, as there is no provision to that effect. In passing the 1989 Act, it was considered that such orders recognising particular bodies should not be made by statutory instrument, given their nature. In restating the provisions, we think that position is right and should continue. In contrast to the 1989 Act, we have stated this in clear terms in the Bill in order to assist the reader.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c415-6GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk