Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Amendment No. A246 deals with disciplinary action. Clearly, the likelihood of an Auditor General being subject to disciplinary sanctions is very remote indeed. But we cannot have an effective monitoring system without sanctions to back it up. Indeed, that is a requirement of the company law directive on auditing. Should proceedings be commenced, and where they would sit with the responsibility of Parliament in these matters, would be an extremely interesting question. That is something on which we might like to reflect. Basically, there is a possibility, at least, of it being in the framework legislation that we have. That is a requirement of the directive.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c432-3GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-12-17 19:40:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314303
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314303
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314303