Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

Clause 857 restates Section 53 of the 1989 Act with a few minor changes. The terms used in Part 33 of the Bill are, on the whole, specific to the regulation of statutory auditors rather than companies. There are some terms which are not defined elsewhere in the Bill and, as has been recognised, there are some which are defined elsewhere but have a slightly different definition for the purposes of Part 33. It is true that some terms have a common meaning in Part 33 and Part 29. However, on the whole, we think there are more differences than common points. That is why we have preferred the drafting approach of defining terms separately for Part 33. As for the issue of Clause 766, they do not apply because Part 33 is not part of the Companies Act as defined in Clause 2.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c440GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk