Proceeding contribution from Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 April 2006. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Health Bill.
Health Bill
In conclusion, I very much hope that the Minister will consider being very specific about the date of implementation of the Bill. I thought that the noble Earl, Lord Howe, rather overstated the case on behalf of the pub trade. He said that members of the pub trade thought that the Bill would not be as comprehensive as it turned out to be and that it would be introduced later. In fact, an overwhelming number of members of the pub trade lobbied for these provisions in the Bill because they felt that those in the previous form of the Bill were uncertain and created an unlevel playing field, and, by and large, they much preferred the provisions of this Bill. I believe that it is much more straightforward to implement the provisions of this Bill, as voted on by the other place, than would have been the case with the format of the previous Bill. There is absolutely no reason why the Bill should not be implemented on 14 March next year.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c546GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Clubs Business Employment Housing Health Human rights Health hazards Exemptions Food Licensed premises Public places Public opinion Public houses Passive smoking Ventilation Tobacco Working conditions Smoking Vehicles
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-15 10:42:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316069
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316069
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316069