Proceeding contribution from Lord Naseby (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 April 2006. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Health Bill.
Health Bill
The noble Baroness said that these were minor issues and that this was a matter of proportionality. Do I understand from that that there is some point at which she thinks particularly important issues should be on the face of the Bill? My question to her is whether the family home—the domestic residence—is something of sufficient importance to be on the face of the Bill. In that light, I hope very much that she would support the noble Lord and me. Our amendment is clear; it talks about ““a private dwelling””, which seems to me not to be a minor issue.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c552GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Clubs Business Employment Housing Health Human rights Health hazards Exemptions Food Licensed premises Public places Public opinion Public houses Passive smoking Ventilation Tobacco Working conditions Smoking Vehicles
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-15 10:41:51 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316090
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316090
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316090