Proceeding contribution from Lord Naseby (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 April 2006. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Health Bill.
Health Bill
I support the noble Lord, Lord Monson. We need to know what an extended period of time is. If it is a matter of days, that is highly relevant. If it is a matter of hours, that is equally relevant. What I am seeking to get from this Bill and this particular amendment is a sensible arrangement. It is not out of the ordinary today for job sharing to take place. A lot of people job share. One person may work Mondays and Tuesdays and the other person works Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays. If that extended time is only for X number of hours, it does not matter. On the other hand, if it lasts for days in a manner that is harmful, as opposed to just being around, I understand that point. I would be grateful if the Minister could clarify that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c598GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Clubs Business Employment Housing Health Human rights Health hazards Exemptions Food Licensed premises Public places Public opinion Public houses Passive smoking Ventilation Tobacco Working conditions Smoking Vehicles
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-15 10:41:51 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316210
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316210
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316210