Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 April 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Work and Families Bill 2005-06.
Work and Families Bill
My Lords, perhaps I may reiterate a point. Our concern is that using this definition would potentially restrict the number of people who could benefit from these arrangements. For good or ill, we already have the definition in respect of ordinary paternity leave and pay. Our concern is that if that were the key criterion, because of the practicalities in some circumstances it would be a more restrictive test. It is quite probable that parental responsibility will align itself with the current definition over a whole range of circumstances and there will be no difference, but to require this technical provision is, we think, potentially restrictive.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 681 c105
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Childcare Carers Fraud Employment Foster care Leave Fathers Flexible working Parental leave Parents Pay Redundancy pay Public holidays Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Parental responsibility Working mothers
- Legislation
- Work and Families Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:49:55 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317115
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317115
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317115