Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Northbourne (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 April 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Work and Families Bill 2005-06.


Work and Families Bill

My Lords, I rise briefly to add my support to these amendments. I know that both Fathers Direct and the Equal Opportunities Commission are concerned that many fathers simply will not be able to afford to take up the additional paternity leave entitlement if it is paid at only £109 a week. We have to decide whether we really mean it when we say that fathers are important. If we do think so, the Government ought seriously to consider stumping up the money for an extra two weeks. The other consideration is flexibility. I strongly agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, that it is absurd for legislation to prevent an employer and employee agreeing on their arrangements for paternity leave. I do not think that I need say any more.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c127 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Childcare Carers Fraud Employment Foster care Leave Fathers Flexible working Parental leave Parents Pay Redundancy pay Public holidays Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Parental responsibility Working mothers
Legislation
Work and Families Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk