Proceeding contribution from Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 April 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Work and Families Bill 2005-06.
Work and Families Bill
My Lords, we may very well do so. I thank the Minister for his reply, and I thank all other contributors to the debate. Any employer who does not know that his employee is about to become a father is a bit of a disgrace—at least at some level in line management. Therefore, the notice period in a way is academic when it comes to the employer knowing that he or she must plan for some leave. If four weeks is enough notice for a change in the date, it certainly should be enough to allow the employer to plan for the original notice period. The Minister is very insistent on the issue of consistency, and he seems to think that the poor employer has such a small brain that he can keep only one notice period in his head at any one time. In that case, why did the Government not make the notice period for additional paternity leave 15 weeks as well? Why did they choose eight weeks?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 681 c131
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Childcare Carers Fraud Employment Foster care Leave Fathers Flexible working Parental leave Parents Pay Redundancy pay Public holidays Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Parental responsibility Working mothers
- Legislation
- Work and Families Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:50:05 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317140
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317140
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317140