Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 3 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill [HL].


Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for his reply. I am of course aware that the Government have been consulting on many aspects of the Bill, but not every response has been incorporated into it. I give as an example the concerns of noble Lords about the various exemptions for regulated activity in relation to vulnerable adults under, I believe, Clause 14. Various noble Lords sought to remove some of the exemption categories. Those exemptions have been responded to by the many organisations which have come forward and asked us to remove them from the Bill. So consultations do not always take into account people’s concerns. This regulation-making power does not affect only the automatic bar provisions but also the scope of regulated activity, as I said in my earlier presentation. I shall read carefully what the Minister has said and consult further about this aspect of the Bill. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 45, as amended, agreed to. Clause 46 agreed to. Schedule 5 [Amendments]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c282GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Children Disclosure of information Abuse Direct payments Employment Evidence Education Exemptions Employment agencies Internet Learning disability Northern Ireland Protection Parents Professions Mental capacity Monitoring Passports Vetting Vulnerable adults Training Sexual offences Regulation Travel restrictions Self-employed Independent Safeguarding Authority
Legislation
Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk