Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

My Lords, my name appears on Amendment No. 349, with that of the noble Baroness, Lady Goudie, but I also support her other amendments in this group. In Grand Committee the Minister explained that the Government positively wanted auditors of quoted companies to make a statement of circumstances connected with their leaving office. Amendment No. 349, to which I have added my name, makes it clear that this is a subjective test, which is an extremely important issue. In Grand Committee the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, said that the objective test was correct because the auditors were protected from having committed an offence by having taken reasonable steps. I suggest that that misses the point. That defence addresses a different issue of whether they took reasonable steps to issue the statement, but it does not address the auditor setting out his own views and not the views of someone else, or some hypothetical auditor on the Clapham omnibus. The issue is that the statement should be of the circumstances that the auditor thinks are appropriate, so I support the amendments.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c146 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disciplinary proceedings Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Liability EU law Documents Exemptions Internet Qualifications Staff Public records Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk