Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
My Lords, I thank the Minister for his reply and for updating me on the new name of what used to be called POBA. It just shows how difficult it is to keep up these days. I appreciate what the Minister has said. I would like to read it again in Hansard, but he has answered the point that I made on the duplication of information flow. I hope that he will look again at the drafting as it is ambiguous whether or not there is a choice of which route information should go. If there is a choice, it is a recipe for administrative problems. I put it no higher than that. I beg leave to withdraw. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 354 to 359 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c153-4
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Liability EU law Documents Exemptions Internet Qualifications Staff Public records Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 19:54:30 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322155
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322155
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322155