Proceeding contribution from Liam Byrne (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
As I shall explain in a moment, the provisions for merging force areas set out in the 1996 Act put sufficient protection in place and require deliberation in the House. In our constitution, referendums are typically reserved for issues of significant constitutional development, such as regional government, to which the hon. Gentleman alluded, and our relationship with the European Union. Under the 1996 Act, a merger may take place either if the police authorities concerned have volunteered or if the Home Secretary considers that a merger would be in the interests of the efficiency or effectiveness of policing. Therefore, there are three lines of constitutional defence.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c324
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Abuse Accountability Crime Bail Committees Fraud Extradition Inspections Functions Protection Police Powers Public appointments Police custody Photographs Referendums Mergers Police authorities Police cautions Paedophilia Standards Sexual offences Registration of births, deaths, marriages and civil partnerships Reorganisation Time limits USA Cryptography General Register Office Street bail scheme
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:52:31 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322383
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322383
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322383