Proceeding contribution from Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
My hon. Friend is being very generous in giving way. Does he agree that the Government could have met their financial objectives, which were set from the O’Connor report onwards, had they not so obviously set their face against federated arrangements such as those offered by the Cambridgeshire and Suffolk police authorities, and that they could have made financial cuts without affecting front-line operational services?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c329
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Abuse Accountability Crime Bail Committees Fraud Extradition Inspections Functions Protection Police Powers Public appointments Police custody Photographs Referendums Mergers Police authorities Police cautions Paedophilia Standards Sexual offences Registration of births, deaths, marriages and civil partnerships Reorganisation Time limits USA Cryptography General Register Office Street bail scheme
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:54:31 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322410
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322410
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322410