Proceeding contribution from David Burrowes (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
Does my hon. Friend agree that there is a wider concern? As the Carter review recommends restricting the involvement of solicitors to a fixed-fee basis, solicitors could be reluctant to give the quality of advice about police bail and conditional cautions that the interests of justice demand. There is concern that justice will not be done if we move from a system of summary justice with effective representation to a system of police representation with a squeeze on solicitors’ budgets.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c377
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Abuse Accountability Crime Bail Committees Fraud Extradition Inspections Functions Protection Police Powers Public appointments Police custody Photographs Referendums Mergers Police authorities Police cautions Paedophilia Standards Sexual offences Registration of births, deaths, marriages and civil partnerships Reorganisation Time limits USA Cryptography General Register Office Street bail scheme
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:53:37 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322519
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322519
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322519