Proceeding contribution from Bob Spink (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
I am following my hon. Friend’s arguments carefully, and he is making a lot of sense, but given that accepting a caution means that the offender will go on the sex offenders register for offences against children, does my hon. Friend acknowledge that it is highly unlikely—indeed, unthinkable—that anyone would accept a caution and not go to court, if they were innocent?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c387
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Abuse Accountability Crime Bail Committees Fraud Extradition Inspections Functions Protection Police Powers Public appointments Police custody Photographs Referendums Mergers Police authorities Police cautions Paedophilia Standards Sexual offences Registration of births, deaths, marriages and civil partnerships Reorganisation Time limits USA Cryptography General Register Office Street bail scheme
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:53:31 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322531
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322531
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322531