Proceeding contribution from Earl of Shrewsbury (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 May 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
I thank the Minister for his words but I completely disagree with him. His approach involves a severe and meaningful restriction of trade. People will go bankrupt because of this. I am terribly sorry, but I cannot accept what he says. I would like to test the opinion of the Chamber. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 120) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 49; Not-Contents, 173. Clause 27 agreed to. Clause 28 [Age limits for purchase etc. of air weapons]: On Question, Whether Clause 28 shall stand part of the Bill?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c605
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Ammunition Crime Crimes of violence Age Anti-social behaviour Airguns Antiques Firearms Imitation firearms Internet Northern Ireland Museums and galleries Markets Pupils Offensive weapons Mobile phones Recordings Sentencing Registration Sales Schools Teachers Young people Sexual offences Right of search Students Tickets Anti-social behaviour orders Football banning orders Home shopping
- Legislation
- Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:34:37 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324908
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324908
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324908