Proceeding contribution from Julian Brazier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
The hon. Gentleman said that the commanding officer would be able to submit evidence. I accept that he could submit evidence to the court martial, but the clause rules out a compromise whereby he could submit evidence before the matter proceeds to court. The word ““directly”” makes it clear that evidence must be submitted before the commanding officer has had an opportunity to have his say.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c1260
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Children Discipline Crime Armed forces Age Deployment Aircraft Courts martial Desertion Certification Custodial treatment Defence equipment Nuisance Prosecutions Military police Officers Sentencing
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-22 08:47:31 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325757
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325757
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325757