Proceeding contribution from Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
Hon. Members are right to recognise the hon. Gentleman’s experience and the usefulness of it. Is he suggesting to the Committee that for the type of crimes outlined in schedule 2, a commanding officer would be able to make a judgment, after a police officer—a service officer or a civilian—had had time to investigate the crime? How would the commanding officer have the time and the means to carry out the sort of investigation that would be needed for some of those crimes?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c1263
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Children Discipline Crime Armed forces Age Deployment Aircraft Courts martial Desertion Certification Custodial treatment Defence equipment Nuisance Prosecutions Military police Officers Sentencing
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-22 08:47:32 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325770
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325770
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325770