Proceeding contribution from Patrick Mercer (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
Again, that is an excellent intervention. The Trooper Williams case underlines it. I take the point that the hon. Member for Portsmouth, North (Sarah McCarthy-Fry) made earlier. As far as Trooper Williams was concerned, the commanding officer was his god. He was his figurehead of leadership, justice and everything that happened inside the 2nd Regiment, Royal Tank Regiment. If we attack that relationship, two things happen. First, the private soldier—lance corporal and so on—feels that there is no longer an umbrella of protection given to him by a man whom he knows personally, who, within the constraints of rank, is a personal friend, and who has probably served with his father, his uncle or other people from the same area—Portsmouth, Newark or wherever.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c1263
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Children Discipline Crime Armed forces Age Deployment Aircraft Courts martial Desertion Certification Custodial treatment Defence equipment Nuisance Prosecutions Military police Officers Sentencing
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-22 08:46:43 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325771
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325771
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325771