Proceeding contribution from Lord Benyon (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
Absolutely. I never rose to the rank or grandeur of my hon. Friend, and my experience of the armed forces is even more dated than his. As a platoon commander in a rifle regiment on operations in Northern Ireland, I represented the views of one of my soldiers to my company commander when that soldier committed a military offence, and I stood in at the hearing at which the charge was put and a punishment was meted out. As a company second in command, I represented my company commander at hearings with the commanding officer when people under my command had committed more serious offences. Clause 116 would impose a glass ceiling, which would mean no responsibility for commanding officers if a crime is serious enough.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c1267
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Children Discipline Crime Armed forces Age Deployment Aircraft Courts martial Desertion Certification Custodial treatment Defence equipment Nuisance Prosecutions Military police Officers Sentencing
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-22 08:47:19 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325790
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325790
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325790