Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Adonis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Childcare Bill.


Childcare Bill

My Lords, in a Delphic passage of my Second Reading speech on the Education and Inspections Bill, I said that issues would be raised by this amendment for that Bill. I meant that, and we are considering the implications. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward. For example, almost all secondary schools and an increasing proportion of primary schools have schools councils, a development that we thoroughly welcome and to which we have given strong encouragement, including in the Education Act 2002. Geoff Whitty, director of the Institute of Education at the University of London, is conducting a review to look at how we can develop further our guidance in respect of schools councils, so there are other issues which need to be considered that are distinct from those related to provision for the under-fives. However, I recognise that we need to consider the implications of one Bill for the other, and we will do so. On that basis, I seem to have managed to unite the House at least at the beginning of our proceedings. I hope that that continues throughout our consideration of the later amendments. On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 6 [Duty to secure sufficient childcare for working parents]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c1012-3 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Childcare Advisory services Childminding Employment Fees and charges Inspections Grandparents Local government Low incomes Parents Pre-school education Local government services Public participation Standards Registration Welfare tax credits Training Kinship care
Legislation
Childcare Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk