Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Buscombe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 5 July 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Education and Inspections Bill.


Education and Inspections Bill

I thank the Minister. I found his response to Amendment No. 21 extremely helpful, and will leave it at that. I fully accept his points and take them on board. I want to think a bit more about AmendmentNo. 67, though, encouraged by the words ““encourage ambition””. I see and understand the Minister’s proposals on a range of measures a local authority should take on board. A lot of this is about the proof of the pudding and leaving it in the hands of local authorities, in practice, to take on board the different considerations and types of measures they could put in place on competitions and proposals for new schools, as well as thinking about how to deal with existing schools through other measures. I am somewhat appeased and placated by the Minister’s response, but will read with care what he has said in Hansard. For now, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 22 not moved.] Clause 3 agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c352 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Disability Children Assessments Admissions Discipline Community development Community schools Governing bodies Faith schools Foundation schools Local government Pupil exclusions Local education authorities Pupils Standards Special educational needs School choice Secondary education Social services Academies Trust schools
Legislation
Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk