Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 6 July 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.


Police and Justice Bill

The noble Lord, Lord Hylton, is right. Of course, there is the possibility of recourse to a court, as there would be here. If you do not accept a fixed penalty notice put to you by the police, for whatever reason, you can go to court. If you do not like the conditional cautions being offered to you by a prosecutor, you can go to court. The court remains at the apex of this system and in overall control of it. I certainly take on board what the right reverend Prelate said about the term ““administrative punishment”” and I will consider it. It is not a term that I use. People say to me that ““conditional caution”” is not exactly a catchy phrase either, so perhaps we need to think generally about them.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c377 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Children Databases Accountability Crime Bail Administration of justice Arrests Anti-social behaviour Community relations Equality Fixed penalties Fines HM Inspectorate of Prisons Local government Offenders Parents Police Powers Membership Prisons Publicity Police authorities Police cautions Race relations Victims Social rented housing Anti-social behaviour orders Parenting contracts Parenting orders Crime and disorder reduction partnerships Hate crime
Legislation
Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk