Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Education and Inspections Bill.
Education and Inspections Bill
That has certainly not been the case in the past. Local education authorities have used that section to provide part-time education for excluded pupils, which I think is why Clause 94 is in the Bill, making full-time provision compulsory. I do not share the Minister's optimism about how that section has been read in the past.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 684 c737
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Education Children Care homes Accountability Detainees Costs Custody Leisure Governing bodies Inspections Migrants Headteachers Local government Mental illness Pupil exclusions Standards Schools Special educational needs Training Young offenders Sports
- Legislation
- Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-12-30 08:15:02 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336752
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336752
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336752