Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Northbourne (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Education and Inspections Bill.


Education and Inspections Bill

I share the view that the issues raised in this debate are hugely important, but I shall not delay the Committee. It seems unrealistic simply to throw more and more responsibilities at the local authority. In my experience, there is no evidence that all local authorities either have been able to or have in fact honoured their obligations in any of these respects, especially in relation to excluded children. More important, I did not hear the word ““family”” mentioned once. Even when children are very detached and damaged, they have families and they work in a context—they are not individuals floating around. Part of the rethink that we should be having about the needs of those children is how we can integrate them either back into their own family group or, if their family group is totally unsuitable, into some other group so that they can have a feeling of belonging.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c738 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Education Children Care homes Accountability Detainees Costs Custody Leisure Governing bodies Inspections Migrants Headteachers Local government Mental illness Pupil exclusions Standards Schools Special educational needs Training Young offenders Sports
Legislation
Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk