Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Cobbold (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 July 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts) (Amendment) Regulations 2006.


Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts) (Amendment) Regulations 2006

My Lords, this document is intensely depressing. It contains a whole new batch of regulations at a time when I thought that it was fashionable to try to reduce regulation. The most demeaning of the new regulations is the requirement that children aged three to 11 and less than 135 centimetres in height must use a child restraint in the back seat of cars. Child restraints are designed for infants; they cost money and take up a lot of space in a car. This regulation outlaws parental judgment; it discriminates against families with several children and families from poorer backgrounds, who may be faced with having to buy a larger car or, indeed, a second car. There are other objectionable features in the document, many of which have been mentioned by other noble Lords. It is a further intrusion of the nanny state into personal and parental choice.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c783 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Buses EU law Exemptions Motor vehicles Safety measures Safety belts
Legislation
Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat belts) (Amendment) Regulations 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk