Proceeding contribution from James Clappison (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 October 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Middle East.
Middle East
My hon. Friend is making a reasonable and well-informed case, but does not the approach to Hamas involve rather more than the British Government? The Quartet, the international community, the United States and Mr. Javier Solana have all told Hamas that it must recognise the state of Israel, renounce violence and accept the commitments that had already been entered into by the Palestinian Authority. That has been said to Hamas since the elections. My hon. Friend says that there is some ambiguity, but the leader of Hamas early this week was completely unambiguous. He stated that Hamas would not recognise the state of Israel. If the international community were to alter its response to Hamas, having already said what it has, what sort of message does he think that would send to Hamas? Perhaps one with which students of the 1930s might be familiar.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c73WH
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Armed forces Armed conflict Deployment Iraq Terrorism Afghanistan Israel Islam Palestine Middle East Lebanon Hamas
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:24:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_351163
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_351163
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_351163