Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Stephen Hammond (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 October 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Bus Services.


Bus Services

We can have franchising within the quality contract. Various other areas are available as evidence of co-operation rather than non-co-operation. I met the managing director of the Brighton and Hove Bus Company—some Members did not want to talk about that this morning—who wrote me a letter about the ingredients for success:"““The key ingredients that we have put into the partnership mixture are frequent services—80 per cent. of our passenger journeys are taken on a bus””" that runs"““every 10 minutes; simple pricing offering value for money; continued, sustained investment in new buses, taking advantage of constantly improving technology and comfort, and a passion for excellent customer service…The Local Authority’s ingredients are the installation of effective bus priority measures…a robust parking management and enforcement regime; effective enforcement of traffic regulations associated with bus priority measures…accessible bus stops which are pleasant to wait at with real time information…As we discussed, the private sector is best placed to deal with the first 5 ingredients…and…the local authorities are best placed to deal with the second 5””." One of the problems in the deregulated market in parts of the country outside London is that a number of the bus companies are becoming increasingly frustrated at what they see as the failings of the local authorities, whereas the local authorities are frustrated at what they see as the failure of the local bus companies either to invest or to be responsive to them.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
450 c17-8WH 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Contracts Bus services Fares Franchises Pay Staff Regulation
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk