Proceeding contribution from Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 October 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Independence of the Judiciary.
Independence of the Judiciary
All these innovative ideas are very welcome. The Minister knows that the Department’s lateral thinking about how to engage with the public is welcome. I want to put to her something that I believe I have put to her formally or informally before. In a borough such as ours, a huge way of engaging the public in the process without compromising judicial independence would be if the local authority leader, the borough police commander, the senior judge and the head of the Crown Prosecution Service for our borough were able to come before the public twice a year and be collectively accountable. It is often not the police that they are concerned about but the sentences of the judges or the decisions of the CPS. If they were accountable, the public could be engaged in that process too.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c43WH
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Administration of justice Constitutions Human rights Judiciary Media Political impartiality Sentencing Reform
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:02:08 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352018
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352018
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352018