Skip to main content

Adjournment debate on Tuesday, 10 October 2006, in the House of Commons, led by Simon Hughes. The answering member was Baroness Harman.


Independence of the Judiciary

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the independence of the judiciary.


Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
450 c25-45WH 
Session
2005-06
Department
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Proceeding contributions
Oliver Heald | 450 c40WH (Link to this contribution) I totally agree, but does the right hon. and learned Lady not agree that the language used by Minist...
Baroness Harman | 450 c40WH (Link to this contribution) All our language should reflect the respect that each bit of the constitution has for the others. It...
Show all contributions (35)
Simon Hughes | 450 c39WH (Link to this contribution) Does the Minister therefore agree that it was not helpful—I am trying to use a neutral word—for The ...
Baroness Harman | 450 c39-40WH (Link to this contribution) Having spoken to many judges in my work as a Minister for my Department, I know that judges find suc...
Baroness Harman | 450 c43-4WH (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman is right. One of the things that the judge in Liverpool does is go to a community...
Simon Hughes | 450 c43WH (Link to this contribution) All these innovative ideas are very welcome. The Minister knows that the Department’s lateral thinki...
Baroness Harman | 450 c43WH (Link to this contribution) The important thing is to learn from the experience of pilot schemes. The hon. Gentleman would be th...
Oliver Heald | 450 c43WH (Link to this contribution) I have been to the North Liverpool community court and was very impressed with Judge Fletcher. An in...
Baroness Harman | 450 c41-3WH (Link to this contribution) We can all agree with the principles. The difficulty in particular individual circumstances is knowi...
Simon Hughes | 450 c40-1WH (Link to this contribution) Throughout my time in the House, I have never had any reason to doubt that the right hon. and learne...
Baroness Harman | 450 c44-5WH (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman raises an important point. There are problems. The Prime Minister has made the po...
Philip Hollobone | 450 c44WH (Link to this contribution) I endorse the suggestion made by the hon. Member for North Southwark and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes). ...
Oliver Heald | 450 c34-5WH (Link to this contribution) I congratulate the hon. Member for North Southwark and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes) on securing an impo...
Simon Hughes | 450 c35WH (Link to this contribution) It was as the hon. Gentleman said, but I hope that he will recognise that some of us—I do not take t...
Oliver Heald | 450 c35-6WH (Link to this contribution) I am quite happy to acquit the hon. Member for North Southwark and Bermondsey on this one. It was th...
Oliver Heald | 450 c36-7WH (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman makes the general point—which is right—that many Ministers are pretty ignorant ab...
Simon Hughes | 450 c36WH (Link to this contribution) Does the hon. Gentleman ever think that the reason why Ministers take such a view about criminal law...
Oliver Heald | 450 c37-8WH (Link to this contribution) Certainly, there is sometimes a public perception that criminals are not being properly sentenced. M...
Philip Hollobone | 450 c37WH (Link to this contribution) Does my hon. Friend believe that there is enough parliamentary scrutiny in the system with the Sente...
Oliver Heald | 450 c39WH (Link to this contribution) I am sure that the Minister will agree, though, that it is important that the media should be able t...
Baroness Harman | 450 c38-9WH (Link to this contribution) I congratulate the hon. Member for North Southwark and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes) on his choice of su...
Baroness Harman | 450 c39WH (Link to this contribution) Yes; I accept the hon. Gentleman’s point. However, the climate can sometimes become difficult if the...
Oliver Heald | 450 c28WH (Link to this contribution) I am following closely what the hon. Gentleman says, and I agree with him. It is important that thos...
Simon Hughes | 450 c25-8WH (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the opportunity to raise an important constitutional subject—the independence of t...
Simon Hughes | 450 c28-30WH (Link to this contribution) It is very worrying, and I am troubled. As I said earlier, we all remember that before becoming a sh...
Oliver Heald | 450 c31WH (Link to this contribution) I congratulate the hon. Member for North Southwark and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes) on securing this de...
Speaker | 450 c32WH (Link to this contribution) Order. There may have been some confusion. I expected that another Member might rise, and that did n...
Oliver Heald | 450 c32WH (Link to this contribution) On a point of order, Mr. Gale. I apologise: no discourtesy was intended and it was simply that neith...
Speaker | 450 c32WH (Link to this contribution) The custom is that the Liberal Front-Bench Spokesman is called first, then the official Opposition s...
Nick Clegg | 450 c32-4WH (Link to this contribution) The apology should be mine. I am unaccustomed to our having a double helping of contributions from t...
Speaker | 450 c32WH (Link to this contribution) No problem. I am sure that no discourtesy was intended, and none is felt.
Philip Hollobone | 450 c30WH (Link to this contribution) I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on securing this debate. I have followed his words with great inte...
Simon Hughes | 450 c30-1WH (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman asked a pair of interlinked questions. First, how in touch are judges at all leve...
Subjects
Administration of justice Constitutions Human rights Judiciary Media Political impartiality Sentencing Reform
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk