Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Harman (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 October 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Independence of the Judiciary.


Independence of the Judiciary

The hon. Gentleman is right. One of the things that the judge in Liverpool does is go to a community reference group, which is comprised of a group of local representatives. One of the things that we will be trying in the further 10 community justice pilots is to assess whether instead of creating a separate community reference group, the existing organisational partnerships can simply include the magistrates or the district judge. In our situation, the Southwark police consultative group would be involved, as they are the people who are concerned about law and order in the borough and are already configured there. It should be perfectly possible for the bench to go along to hear the sorts of things that are being said. People well recognise that we cannot wave a magic wand and solve all problems. If people are prepared to listen to such bodies, they will give credit for at least understanding, knowing and trying to do what they can. The difficulty is that if people are told that decisions are being made in their interests and in the interests of justice, but they do not know who by and they do not believe that such people understand the problems that exist in local communities—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
450 c43-4WH 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Administration of justice Constitutions Human rights Judiciary Media Political impartiality Sentencing Reform
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk