Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Animal Welfare Bill.
Animal Welfare Bill
My Lords, I will include that question in the advice that I receive but, as I said, there is nothing stopping an inspector issuing a new corrected notice on a different date—or, if, for some reason, they are issued on the same day, the inspector would time the second notice. The latest notice would be the one to which the person would have had to operate or be subject to prosecution. I will check that out and also write to the noble Baroness on the McCluskey case, concerning horses, that she mentioned.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 685 c1020
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Animal housing Animal welfare Codes of practice Abuse Birds Appeals Cattle Circuses Licensing Inspections Dogs Greyhound racing Domestic animals Game Powers of entry Livestock Pets Registration Standards Sales Sheep Zoos RSPCA Veterinary services State Veterinary Service Prizes Greyhounds Goldfish
- Legislation
- Animal Welfare Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:07:04 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353953
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353953
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353953