Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Duke of Montrose (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Animal Welfare Bill.


Animal Welfare Bill

My Lords, we are glad to see that the noble Baroness has tabled this amendment. It is a beefed-out version of the amendment we tabled in Committee. Again, as the noble Baroness has pointed out, things have changed. The Government announced on 10 October that they have proposals for new measures; I am little surprised that they have not given us an amendment of their own. Perhaps the Minister can explain why it has not been appropriate for the Government to table an amendment at this time. The Government’s proposals are in a similar vein to some of the questions of the noble Baroness, Lady Miller. It would be helpful to the House if they could clarify what was meant by the description of, "““pet fairs that do not involve the sale of animals, or that do involve the sale of animals but not in the course of a business””." We shall listen to the Minister’s response. At present, however, I would support the noble Baroness.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
685 c1038 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Animal housing Animal welfare Codes of practice Abuse Birds Appeals Cattle Circuses Licensing Inspections Dogs Greyhound racing Domestic animals Game Powers of entry Livestock Pets Registration Standards Sales Sheep Zoos RSPCA Veterinary services State Veterinary Service Prizes Greyhounds Goldfish
Legislation
Animal Welfare Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk