Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Animal Welfare Bill.


Animal Welfare Bill

My Lords, I shall break the habit of a lifetime and say that I would love to be able to accept the amendment in order to repay the co-operation and support for the Bill that has been received from across the House. Unfortunately, I am unable to do so. But I have a good reason for not being able to do so and I hope that the noble Baroness will find it acceptable. As the noble Baroness said, Amendment No. 34 would enable the court to impose further restrictions under the terms of a disqualification order. Accepting the amendment would result in a court being able to disqualify a person convicted of a relevant offence from being in control—albeit only temporarily—of an animal owned or kept by someone else by riding, driving or using it. The expression ““using an animal”” is a broad one and would give the court considerably greater power to draw up the terms of the disqualification order. There are good intentions behind the amendment—both noble Baronesses have made that clear.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
685 c1046-7 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Animal housing Animal welfare Codes of practice Abuse Birds Appeals Cattle Circuses Licensing Inspections Dogs Greyhound racing Domestic animals Game Powers of entry Livestock Pets Registration Standards Sales Sheep Zoos RSPCA Veterinary services State Veterinary Service Prizes Greyhounds Goldfish
Legislation
Animal Welfare Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk