Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
Whether or not the hon. and learned Gentleman believes it, I am listening carefully to his speech and I am trying to work out what his principal objection is. Perhaps he could elucidate it for the House. Does he object principally because he perceives a lack of reciprocity, which is why he referred to the list from Albania to Zimbabwe, or because the evidential burden—the information in contradistinction to probable cause—is too big a gap evidentially? Is it one or both objections that trouble him?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c1405
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime Burglary Evidence Extradition Inspections Drugs Fines International cooperation HM Inspectorate of Prisons Police Powers Prosecutions Prisons Offensive weapons Mergers Police authorities Police community support officers Police cautions Reciprocal arrangements Treaties USA
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:02:02 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_354328
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_354328
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_354328