Proceeding contribution from Philip Dunne (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
On level 2 protective services, does the Minister agree that one of the benefits of closing the gap was raising the focus within all constabularies on the need to provide such services? One of the perverse benefits of the decision not to proceed with mergers was that many forces—my own of West Mercia included—have gone a long way towards addressing the perceived shortfalls in providing those services and are now, of their own volition, putting in even greater resources in order to meet those shortcomings.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c1455
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime Burglary Evidence Extradition Inspections Drugs Fines International cooperation HM Inspectorate of Prisons Police Powers Prosecutions Prisons Offensive weapons Mergers Police authorities Police community support officers Police cautions Reciprocal arrangements Treaties USA
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 19:17:47 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_354449
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_354449
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_354449