Proceeding contribution from Martin Horwood (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Charities Bill (HL).

Charities Bill [Lords]

I remember the hon. Gentleman teasing members of the Standing Committee about supporting an amendment, which he described as"““harmless, albeit not entirely necessary””.—[Official Report, Standing Committee A, 4 July 2006; c. 6.]" Now, that amendment has been introduced as a Government amendment. Should we regard something which is harmless, albeit not entirely necessary, as the High Peak principle?

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 450 c1560
Session: 2005-06
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Subjects: Disability Appeals Charities Audit Company law Companies Charity Commission Charitable donations Health Finance Land Gun sports Human rights Fundraising Private education Property transfer Property Schools Religion Regulation Sports Trusts Wills Humanism Chess
Legislation: Charities Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Charities Bill [Lords]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools