Proceeding contribution from Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 October 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) (Amendment) Order 2006.
Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) (Amendment) Order 2006
If the complainant is not satisfied with the reply given by the chief immigration officer, to whom does he go? We were told that his route of complaint would be, first, to the chief immigration officer and then, if he was not satisfied with that, to the monitor. If no monitor has been appointed, to whom does he go when he is not satisfied in the first instance?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 686 c25GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Detainees Fingerprints Immigration controls Energy Freight Immigration officers France Ports Treaties Training Right of search Smuggling Vehicles Dunkirk Port of Calais Boulogne
- Legislation
- Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) (Amendment) Order 2006
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:43:51 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_355817
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_355817
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_355817