Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redwood (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.


Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill

It is a great pity that once again we do not have enough time to have a civilised, sensible debate about an important underlying issue, over-regulation, and ways in which it might be tackled. I support the Lords amendment, and it is right that there should be as much of a parliamentary check as possible in a world in which Ministers normally command majorities and can therefore rightly carry their wishes in a democratic format. It is good that it has been recognised that we need to— It being two hours after commencement of proceedings Mr. Deputy Speaker put forthwith the Question already proposed from the Chair, pursuant to Orders [9 February, 15 May and this day]. Lords amendment agreed to. Remaining Lords amendments agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
451 c763-4 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Bureaucracy Devolution Committees Constitutional and administrative law Legislative process Exemptions Legislative competence Functions Legislation Law Commission Powers Parliamentary scrutiny Regulation Taxation Statutory instruments
Legislation
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk