Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 December 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) Regulations 2006.


Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) Regulations 2006

I am grateful to the Minister for that, and to the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, for his questions. We obviously support the Minister’s drive to minimise red tape that so many farmers and land managers must go through and lessen the burdens on business. Both of us want British agriculture to succeed; there is no difference between us on that. I must say, however, that we will look carefully at all the statutory instruments that come through. If we feel that the Merits Committee has raised concerns, we shall take a view: some we raise with the Minister, and others we do not. This one, however, we felt that we should. Before I finally sit down, I again seek clarification on something I have raised. The committee referred to different members states looking at this regulation in different ways. Is the Minister satisfied that it will in no way disadvantage UK producers or land managers, compared with others throughout the EU? I support flexibility to a certain extent, but I do not want to see flexibility disadvantaging UK producers and land managers.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c24-5GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Agriculture Finance Land Environment protection EU law Fines Environmental impact assessment Land use Rural areas Natural England EU environmental policy
Legislation
Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) Regulations 2006
Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) (No. 2) Regulations 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk