Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 December 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) Regulations 2006.
Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) Regulations 2006
That is the dilemma. I shall take advice and perhaps write to the noble Baroness on that, but if matters are left to member states things will be done slightly differently in each. On the other hand, if there is rigidity from Brussels, everyone will complain, ““It doesn’t suit our local circumstances””. I said that we were following a similar pattern to, for example, Ireland and the Netherlands in the way that we used the lack of a definition in the regulations. We simply transposed the same words in the directive, because that was the legally safe way of doing it. But if there is a relevant issue relating to the treatment of the regulations by different European countries, I shall gladly write to the noble Baroness.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 687 c25GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Agriculture Finance Land Environment protection EU law Fines Environmental impact assessment Land use Rural areas Natural England EU environmental policy
- Legislation
- Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) Regulations 2006
- Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) (No. 2) Regulations 2006
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:50:07 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_363007
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_363007
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_363007