Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]
Before my noble friend sits down, does she not agree that this amendment isalso the subject, invariably, of appealing against the decision involved? All cases must be judged by this criterion. In all cases before courts and tribunals the interests of justices must be achieved. So why is she taking the amendment away?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 687 c73GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Appeals Asylum Finance Legal aid scheme Judiciary Immigration Judgements Qualifications Membership Public appointments Tribunals Council on Tribunals Tribunals Service
- Legislation
- Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:48:00 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365217
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365217
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365217