Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 January 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [HL].
Legal Services Bill [HL]
I could not agree more and we await the Minister’s further contribution. I hope that the noble Viscount will forgive me for having introduced this short debate, but it is important to consider the kind of structures that might be put in place. If the answer is that no structures are necessary because there will be provisions in the Bill, I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Maclennan of Rogart, that the amendments are unnecessary. However, we await more detail from the Minister. I pay tribute to the fact that she is seeking to meet us and in that context I have pleasure in begging leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 38B to 38D not moved.] Clause 12 [Meaning of ““reserved legal activity”” and ““legal activity””]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 688 c942
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Appeals Competition Legal profession Fees and charges Education Law Society Public appointments Patents Standards Training Regulation Solicitors Trade marks Wills Legal Services Board Legal Services Consumer Panel
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:16:52 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371681
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371681
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371681