Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 January 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [HL].
Legal Services Bill [HL]
I was not suggesting that the noble Lord was anything other than concerned. I merely pointed out that my noble friend was surely not a lone voice, because we are all interested in the voice of the consumer. The tradition of the noble Lord’s party on this matter should be well remembered as we go through the Bill. I shall deal with the amendment briefly in exactly the way that the noble Lord asked me to do. As I said when I spoke to Amendments Nos. 52 and 56, the board’s actions under Clauses 30 to 35 will be subject to judicial review, and there is no need to prescribe further statutory assurances to that effect.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 688 c1039
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Consumers Appeals Business Competition Legal profession Fees and charges Fines Powers Regulation Rural areas Legal Services Board
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:18:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_372351
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_372351
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_372351