Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Tuesday, 23 January 2007, in the House of Lords.
Legal Services Bill [HL]
Legal Services Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage third day. Clauses 32 to 69 agreed to. Schedules 7 to 9 agreed to. Clause 70 under consideration. Part 1 of 2 records.
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 688 c1004-66
- Session
- 2006-07
- Department
- Department for Constitutional Affairs
- Legislative stage
- Committee stage
- Procedure
- New clauses
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Related items
-
Legal Services Bill (HL). In two volumes. Explanatory Notes HL Bill 9-EN also published.
Thursday, 23 November 2006
Bills
House of Lords
- Proceeding contributions
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1010-2 (Link to this contribution) Before I failed to realise that the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, had not spoken, I was about to say w...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1010 (Link to this contribution) It will be even more interesting. I join all noble Lords who have congratulated my noble friend Lor...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1012 (Link to this contribution) I am fascinated by some of the Minister’s comments. The procedure of judicial review has arisen—this...
-
Lord Whitty | 688 c1009-10 (Link to this contribution) I am not sure whether I should continue this dialogue for much longer, but I did object to the thres...
-
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c1010 (Link to this contribution) Surely the noble Lord will concede that it would be unacceptable to use a big stick to thrash an inn...
-
Lord Whitty | 688 c1010 (Link to this contribution) If the noble Lord heard me right, he will know that I said ““carry”” a big stick—that is, have sanct...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1010 (Link to this contribution) What an interesting start to our deliberations—
-
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c1008-9 (Link to this contribution) This is an important point, whether one looks at Amendment No. 52, which we are currently discussing...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1009 (Link to this contribution) With respect, I quite understand what the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, is saying. This issue arose with ...
-
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c1008 (Link to this contribution) I welcome the probing amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Campbell of Alloway. I acknowledge, as he di...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1005-7 (Link to this contribution) Yes, but I have to refer to it as relevant. I have had a word with the noble Lord. Thank you very mu...
-
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 688 c1005 (Link to this contribution) My understanding is that Amendment No. 65 will be taken later.
-
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 688 c1005 (Link to this contribution) Would the noble Lord, Lord Campbell of Alloway, be so helpful as to say whether that means that Amen...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1005 (Link to this contribution) I did not quite hear what the noble Baroness said, but if I go wrong I would be grateful if she woul...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1004-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, on behalf of my noble and learned friend, I beg to move that the House do now again resolv...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1005 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 52: 52: Clause 32 , page 16, line 30, at end insert ““; and a direction given ...
-
Lord Whitty | 688 c1016 (Link to this contribution) I indicated earlier that I would oppose Amendment No. 56; what has been said has not changed my mind...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1016 (Link to this contribution) After a cursory glance at the clause, I am inclined to agree with my noble friend about the defects ...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1014-5 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 56: 56: After Clause 34 , insert the following new Clause— ““Appeal against pu...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1015 (Link to this contribution) We support the amendment in principle, but it is encapsulated in my Amendment No. 65, which we shall...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1012-3 (Link to this contribution) I take the view that public bodies operate in a way means that there is a right of judicial review. ...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1013-4 (Link to this contribution) I sincerely thank all noble Lords who have spoken. One has to accept that it is inevitable that some...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1016 (Link to this contribution) My noble friend Lord Campbell of Alloway has drawn my attention to Amendment No. 79, which I have wi...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1016 (Link to this contribution) I meant Clause 79, which says that the Secretary of State can set up anyone he likes as a body to he...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1015 (Link to this contribution) I agree with the point of my noble friend Lord Kingsland. I do not want to repeat the comments that ...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1016 (Link to this contribution) On a matter of principle, I draw the attention of the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, to Amendment No. 7...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1019-20 (Link to this contribution) I suppose that one could begin with the definition of ““public censure””. If one took the extreme vi...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1020 (Link to this contribution) I am totally lost. I am sure that it is my fault. I have been trying to understand. We are not going...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1019 (Link to this contribution) With respect, the question should be how the board would arrive at its decisions. In other words, we...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1019 (Link to this contribution) I shall try to approach the problem from a slightly different angle. Publicly censuring a statutory ...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1018 (Link to this contribution) My ambition would be that it never need use that power. It would be foolish for me to try to determi...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1018-9 (Link to this contribution) In some respects, I understand the noble Baroness’s hesitations, but we are left with a situation wh...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1018 (Link to this contribution) That is right: it is to do with ABS. You cannot totally isolate this. By the time you have an obliga...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1016-7 (Link to this contribution) Lying behind a lot of concerns expressed about the lack of appeal procedures in the Legal Services B...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1017 (Link to this contribution) I shall try to deal with the points that have been raised. My noble friend Lord Whitty raised a fund...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1020-1 (Link to this contribution) It is never my intention to confuse the noble Lord, Lord Campbell of Alloway, and I apologise unrese...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1021 (Link to this contribution) When the Minister is writing to my noble friend will she reflect on the underlying concern behind ma...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1022-3 (Link to this contribution) I read out exactly what the noble and learned Lord read out in Clause 3(3). I agree with him that th...
-
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c1022 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness is so charming with her metaphors but it is interesting that she picks up the met...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1023-5 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 61: 61: Clause 36, page 17, line 38, at end insert— ““( ) that the approved re...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1025-6 (Link to this contribution) I hope the Minister will reflect on where we are. The Joint Select Committee, as my noble friend has...
-
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c1025 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment. Although I shall listen with great interest to the views of the Minister, t...
-
Lord Whitty | 688 c1026 (Link to this contribution) The longer I stay in this Chamber, the more my anxiety mounts about where the opposition parties and...
-
Lord Whitty | 688 c1027-8 (Link to this contribution) I think I am reflecting the views of consumers of legal services—not all of them, not necessarily th...
-
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c1027 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord for giving way and I will certainly not rise to his fly by seeking t...
-
Lord Whitty | 688 c1026-7 (Link to this contribution) I was simply reflecting on the fact that consumers can usually expect some degree of support within ...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1031 (Link to this contribution) I always like to be encouraged to develop my thinking. The point that comes to my mind is that ““las...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1030 (Link to this contribution) That is an encouraging response from the Minister, but would she not agree that the power to impose ...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1028-30 (Link to this contribution) I feel compelled to join this conversation. It is important to describe the power and the approach w...
-
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c1028 (Link to this contribution) I was not going to speak, but I find it very difficult not to say something. The noble Lord, Lord Wh...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1031 (Link to this contribution) I do not know what the noble and learned Lord refers to.
-
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c1031 (Link to this contribution) I cannot remember the circumstances in which the Legal Services Ombudsman issued a financial penalty...
-
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c1031 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Whitty, referred to an occasion on which that happened. It may be that I should...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1032-3 (Link to this contribution) Although I am disappointed at the noble Baroness’s unwillingness to expunge the fine provisions from...
-
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c1032 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord is right. I now recall that it did relate to complaints procedures. We have recognise...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1034 (Link to this contribution) The regulator and the supervisory regulator may both believe that they are acting in the public inte...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1033 (Link to this contribution) I, too, am grateful to the Minister for her response to the last amendment. However, I return to Cla...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1031 (Link to this contribution) My recollection is that a fine of £250,000 was imposed by the Legal Services Ombudsman on the Law So...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1034 (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lord. I was saying sotto voce that I was reading the report every other night. I t...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1034-5 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 63: 63: Clause 38 , page 19, line 24, at end insert— ““( ) that the imposition...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1035 (Link to this contribution) We support these amendments. It is clear that Clause 38(7) is an ouster clause. I agree with the nob...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1038 (Link to this contribution) I hope that the noble Lord will say what he intended to say about my noble friend Lord Whitty when h...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1037-8 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 65: 65: After Clause 38, insert the following new Clause— ““Approved regulator...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1037 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the noble Baroness. I understand that, if what she has just told the Committee...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1037 (Link to this contribution) My notes say that the answer to that question is yes. If I discover in the next minute that that is ...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1037 (Link to this contribution) All I really want to know is that, in the system under Clause 38 which is constrained by a 42-day li...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1037 (Link to this contribution) I was saying that because this is about financial penalties, we have ensured that the procedure cove...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1036-7 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for her reply. I am, of course, aware that, where there is ...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1035-6 (Link to this contribution) We have already had some discussion about the rationale behind the approach we have taken, so I will...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1049 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord has raised an interesting point. The difficulty with the amendments is that, in a sen...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1049 (Link to this contribution) Nevertheless, I hope that the Minister can understand the natural sense of unfairness experienced by...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1050-1 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 106B: 106B: Clause 53 , page 30, line 2, at end insert— ““(2A) An external reg...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1049-50 (Link to this contribution) I am cautiously encouraged by what the Minister said. She might be disappointed to hear that, becaus...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1051 (Link to this contribution) Under Clause 53 we have provisions to ensure that approved regulators can take steps to prevent conf...
-
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c1047 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful for that offer from the Minister. Clause 48 agreed to. Clause 49 agreed to. Cl...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1047 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 106: 106: Clause 50, page 27, line 18, at end insert— ““( ) Practising fee inc...
-
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c1046 (Link to this contribution) I take this opportunity to acknowledge with gratitude the reply to the earlier amendment dealing wit...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1047-8 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord was succinct in speaking to Amendment No. 106. I understand that setting out a financ...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1044 (Link to this contribution) My question was by no means idle. In the course of the Minister’s response—I think to my noble frien...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1045-6 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the Minister for patiently responding to the many interventions made in the co...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1045 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord quite reasonably says that my words become irrelevant in the context of the setting u...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1045 (Link to this contribution) My recollection is that I had made the point that when the Legal Services Board is established it wi...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1045 (Link to this contribution) I am not disputing that I will see whether that is reflected. I was, however, making a particular po...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1044 (Link to this contribution) If we returned with an amendment that exactly reflected what the Minister thought underlies policy s...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1044 (Link to this contribution) My position is that, yesterday and today, I agreed to look at whether we have a correct explanation,...
-
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c1043 (Link to this contribution) Clearly the Minister has not read enough Edgar Allan Poe.
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1043-4 (Link to this contribution) Not for a long time. I have been too busy reading the Select Committee reports to have time to read ...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1044 (Link to this contribution) Amendment No. 105B has three arms. The first requires the board to respect the principle that primar...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1044 (Link to this contribution) I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord, but I am not sure about the imminent risk of significant dam...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1042 (Link to this contribution) I was not seeking to require the Legal Services Board to look at my words for how it should operate ...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1042 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for her words. However, I am slightly concerned by her analogy with the Financi...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1043 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to noble Lords. I do not think any eyebrows were raised; I just did not know what ““in...
-
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c1043 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Baroness for her reply to the debate in which I did not participate. Some...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1041-2 (Link to this contribution) That presupposes that the noble Lord is in charge of whether there is a cliff for me. I am not sure ...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1041 (Link to this contribution) No cliff. Thank you so much. The noble Lord, Lord Kingsland is right—
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1040 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, for giving me an opportunity to say a little more a...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1039-40 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 105B: 105B: Clause 48, page 26, line 23, at end insert— ““( ) Any statement of...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1040 (Link to this contribution) I agree with my noble friend because although the Minister has given us a great deal of comfortable ...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1039 (Link to this contribution) In the light of that response, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdraw...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1039 (Link to this contribution) I was not suggesting that the noble Lord was anything other than concerned. I merely pointed out tha...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1038 (Link to this contribution) That is the case. When we get to the section on alternative structures, we will be arguing from the ...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1051-2 (Link to this contribution) I do not know off the top of my head. Perhaps I may write to the noble Duke and explain it. Because ...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1052 (Link to this contribution) The Minister could not have been more helpful in her response. In those circumstances, I beg leave t...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1052 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 107: 107: Clause 62 , page 34, line 24, at end insert— ““and, in either case, ...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1052 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord will not be surprised that I do not seek to disagree with the principle here at all. ...
-
Duke of Montrose | 688 c1051 (Link to this contribution) I realise that this section of the Bill does not apply to Scotland, but what would happen if a Scott...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1058-60 (Link to this contribution) An interesting debate has brought together noble Lords across the Committee. It is important that I ...
-
Lord Whitty | 688 c1058 (Link to this contribution) I will make clear later my strong support in principle for alternative business structures. Some of ...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1057-8 (Link to this contribution) The noble and learned Lord, Lord Woolf, has made such an important contribution to this debate. He h...
-
Lord Woolf | 688 c1056-7 (Link to this contribution) I have listened with fascination to the Committee’s deliberations today. I thought that I knew every...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1054 (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to the Minister. I apologise for failing to give her specific notice. I thought t...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1055-6 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 108: 108: Clause 70 , page 40, line 32, at end insert— ““( ) Without prejudice...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1053 (Link to this contribution) The Minister will not be surprised to hear me speak on Clause 68. I pointed out at Second Reading th...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1053-4 (Link to this contribution) I am happy to try to address those two points. It is always a joy to respond to the noble Lord. I so...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1064 (Link to this contribution) Apart from listening to the Minister, has this Commissioner the slightest knowledge of the provision...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1064 (Link to this contribution) I suspect not, and I was not trying to suggest that she had. I was referring to the issue that the n...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1064 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for responding to my probing amendment in such detail. Perh...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1064-5 (Link to this contribution) I am nervous about the description of the incremental approach that the noble Lord has just given. I...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1063 (Link to this contribution) Why does the Minister have to go to Europe, where there is a different legal system and profession a...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1063-4 (Link to this contribution) Somebody in Europe! I am surprised at the noble Lord, considering the position that the Liberal Demo...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1065 (Link to this contribution) My problem is that we cannot stipulate that there will be five, 10 or whatever, not least because th...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1065-6 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness anticipated my next question when she asked, ““How do we know what is happening?”...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1066 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord. Let me be clear about what I have committed myself to do—the crumbs...
-
Lord Davies of Oldham | 688 c1066 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move that the House do now resume. In moving the Motion, may I suggest that the Committee s...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1066 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness has been extremely fair. In those circumstances, I beg leave to withdraw the amen...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1060 (Link to this contribution) What are the regulatory objectives?
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1060-1 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, is quite right to ask again about the regulatory objectives...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1060 (Link to this contribution) The regulatory objectives are set out in the Bill. We have discussed them before.
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1060 (Link to this contribution) At the beginning?
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1062-3 (Link to this contribution) If we look at how the Bill is constructed, we can see how the Law Society, for example, would become...
-
Lord Woolf | 688 c1063 (Link to this contribution) I hope the Minister will forgive me if I press her on one additional aspect that I am not sure has b...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1061-2 (Link to this contribution) There would not be a devastating effect on access to justice. That is the point. I will use my words...
-
Duke of Montrose | 688 c1062 (Link to this contribution) After what the Minister has just told the Committee, would she expect that every person applying for...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1063 (Link to this contribution) We have to be careful about the word ““protected””. One critical and important aspect of this measur...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1021-2 (Link to this contribution) I am happy to deal with the phrases that I use in trying to express myself—perhaps not as a lawyer. ...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1041 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may explain that it is the sunset uplands we are seeking the Minister to move gently along...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1052-3 (Link to this contribution) I would of course prefer to have it in the Bill, as I indicated in my opening remarks, but I am deli...
-
Lord Whitty | 688 c1009 (Link to this contribution) I say to the noble Lord, Lord Campbell of Alloway, that I was not going to oppose this amendment, at...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1007-8 (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to my noble friend Lord Campbell of Alloway not only for his tremendously hard wo...
-
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c1026 (Link to this contribution) It is wrong for the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, to seek to make this a party political matter. I am not...
-
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c1032 (Link to this contribution) I mentioned disciplinary procedures a moment ago. I am wrong about that—it is the complaints procedu...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1031-2 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord and I am sure that he is right. I had hoped that I had finished the ...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1046-7 (Link to this contribution) I see the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, nodding in support; I save him getting up to do so. The purpo...
-
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c1056 (Link to this contribution) At Second Reading, my noble friend Lord Thomas of Gresford indicated the deep concerns which we on t...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1018 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for her response to these two amendments. The noble Lord, L...
-
Lord Kingsland | 688 c1023 (Link to this contribution) The Minister has been absolutely clear about these amendments: she is against them for a variety of ...
-
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c1031 (Link to this contribution) I think that I said that the Legal Services Commissioners have the power to fine—I did not say that ...
- Subjects
- Complaints Consumers Appeals Business Competition Legal profession Fees and charges Fines Powers Regulation Rural areas Legal Services Board
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all contributions (150)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 09:40:34 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_61454
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_61454
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_61454